[ Download ]
Abstract
China’s retired electric vehicle (EV)
battery recycling system faces rapidly increasing end-of-life supply,
persistent formal–informal competition, and uncertainty over policy withdrawal.
Existing models often equate strategy probabilities with formalization and
overlook unreturned stocks, consumer channel choice, and processing capacity.
This study develops a 2020–2050 system dynamics model linking a cohort–Weibull
retirement module with material-conserving battery flows, channel allocation,
capacity expansion, authorized integration, metal recovery, relative
environmental burden, and adaptive policy withdrawal. All scenarios share a
fixed 25% formal-processing share in 2025. Under current policy, the formal
share reaches only 52.95% by 2050, while informal processing and unreturned
stocks remain substantial. Among single pathways, subsidy plus capacity support
accelerates early formalization, whereas enforcement achieves the highest
nominal 2050 share (60.83%). Integration is conditional on licensed capacity:
108.50 GWh yr−1 is requested for transfer in 2050, but only 51.27
GWh yr−1 is realized. Fixed, life-cycle, and staged portfolios reach
68.32%, 65.77%, and 66.49%, respectively. Relative to the fixed portfolio, the
adaptive portfolios reduce model-accounted government expenditure by 29.68% and
45.14%, with endpoint losses of 2.55 and 1.82 percentage points. Across 200
Latin-hypercube draws centered on the nominal settings, suppression is the
leading single pathway in 97.5% of cases, while each portfolio exceeds the best
single pathway in every draw. The results support sequential governance that
combines early capacity building, persistent baseline enforcement,
capacity-constrained integration, and gradual withdrawal after observable
maturity conditions are met.
Keywords: Retired EV batteries, Formal and informal
recycling, System dynamics, Extended producer responsibility, Policy portfolio,
Capacity constraint.