Abstract
The positive externalities of green
producers usually reduce the company's earnings. Whether the markets give sufficient
premium is important. Sampling the data of listed companies from May 2005 to
April 2017 in Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share main-board markets, we construct 12
portfolios based on market factor RMRF, scale factor SMB, book-to-market factor
HML and green factor GF. Results show: 1) SMB premium is significant positive,
while HML is negative; 2) For green concept stocks, HML has a significant
positive impact; 3) Portfolio with non-green concept stocks has a higher
return; 4) GF has a significant negative risk premium on China’s green concept
stocks, and the premium level will decrease as the book-to-market ratio
increases. The interpretation of the above premium anomalies improves national
environmental protection policies which is of great significance for the
formation of a sound environmental protection industry.
Keywords:
Factor Model; Green Finance; Premium Anomalies; Excess Return; Environmental
Protection.